Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:45
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
First glimpse of a charred scroll after two millennia thanks to AI and X-rays - Earth.com
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Who is the beast of Revelation 13?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Do guys prefer big boobs or small boobs? Why?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Dazzling Royal Diamonds and Pearls to Celebrate Trooping the Colour in London - The Court Jeweller
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How can I remove decimals in math?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What’s next?
Kylie Jenner Makes Cheetah Print Airplane Sweats Look So Chic While Leaving Venice - instyle.com